![]() ![]() And now we feel it, even when we don't see it in detail. Who would care for the correction of small imbalances that everybody once agreed only mattered for objects a lightyear away? Well, it seems newer and higher resolution sensors do care about those extra nanometers of precision. Nowadays these are applied to near-focus subjects like your cat, six feet away. We have APO lenses for 50mm and 35mm, which is a ridiculous idea, because the precision they offer was meant for tele lenses and astronomy telescopes, capturing things at far distances. If I were to state a generality as to where lens design has been moving, it has been in the direction of more control of the light rays. © Thorsten Overgaard.Īnd then there are the lenses. Leica M11 with Leica 50mm Noctilux-M ASPH f/0.95. It is also very likely that it helps separate details in shadows, and perhaps even helps the sensor see with more clarity and detail overall, in highlights as well. The backlit sensor should result in better recording in the dark, in marketing material often referred to as night. And as with sound, the more detail in a visual recording, the simpler and lighter the overall impression seems to become. If we compare this to sound, maybe you’ve experienced a great stereo where even without being able to register every detail that makes up the overall acoustic signal, you definitely hear a superior sound clarity. But apparently, without going close at all, you may sense more details, even though your eyes can't see nor separate them. More megapixels simply means that the closer you go, the more you see. Leica M11 with Leica 50mm APO-Summicron-M ASPH f/2.0. Nicolas is the proud owner of this Ford Mustang 1966. We know there is higher resolution, there is a backlit sensor, and then there are great lenses, perfected during the design phase years ago in anticipation of this moment in time where sensors might be able to record what those lenses were capable of seeing. ![]() And with lightness, I mean the type of lightness not from being “thin” files, but from being files with so much horsepower behind them - image data and image depth - that they effortless display a crisp and clear image in which you can feel the textures. You can actually feel it, and you can see it: There is an aliveness and lightness to the images of the Leica M11. © Thorsten Overgaard.Īside from everything that can be analyzed and said about the Leica M11 sensor, let's just for a moment forget all that and simply look at the pictures. After all, it is you who takes the photographs. In this article, I'll talk about the technical side of Leica M11, but just as much I’ll talk about you as the user. The first and most important breakthrough in using any camera, is the decision to make it work. My opinion is that you can get almost any camera to work and show the color fidelity that you want and like. This is a continuous review from that continues on, and. Video review : Leica M11 - or keep the Leica M10-R?īy: Thorsten Overgaard. Video review : Leica M11 Mechanical vs Electronic Shutter". Video review : Leica M11 Colors and Sensor Video review : Which Leica is the beat deal in photography? Video review : Leica M11 in Daily Life 4 months later Video review : Thorsten Overgaard and the Leica. ![]() ![]() Leica M11 Digital Rangefinder Camera Review. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |